Stroker crank clearance

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

In my mind I've got the figure of 60 thou. After a quick whizz round the net I can't find anything to back that up, so don't take that as definite. Still looking, I will need to know this myself soon....
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
User avatar
latil
Posts: 12076
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 05 10:37 pm
Location: Steve Pearson MMA/014. East Grinstead and Carmarthen.

Post by latil »

Found this ; You need to install high-quality main studs and billet main caps if
they are available. Mock up the short block and check for counterweight clearance everywhere in the crankcase (especially at the pan rails). Check each individual crank throw, counterweight and rod clearance through a complete 360° of rotation. Minor grinding on the block or rotating assembly is okay. Next check rod-to-cam interference through a full 720º rotation. You need at least .100? clearance everywhere to be safe.

It's from www.enginebuilder.com
1965 Belvedere 2 426 Wedge.

Climate change,global warming,the biggest tax raising scam ever devised by man for mankind.

Motivating Our People,Accelerating Rapidly.
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

Blimey that sounds like a lot, just posted the question on Moparts, lets see what comes up from that...
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

According to Mopar engine Guru Chuck Senatore 60" thou is good .....or
better still machine the crank counter weights
The inside edges of the 2 small counter weights need to be done on a lathe.... at a 45 degree angle 1/4 inch wide.
also some diameter can be taken off the overall diameter of CW's
thus lightening an already lighter set up...
.100" is a good starting point, exact amount depends on piston/rod weight.

Block grinding is easier, but turning down the counterweights is better
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

According to a book I have, 50 thou is enough clearance.
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

Just got a reply of 50 thou. minimum....
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
User avatar
latil
Posts: 12076
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 05 10:37 pm
Location: Steve Pearson MMA/014. East Grinstead and Carmarthen.

Post by latil »

50 thou sounds plenty,allowing for rotational distortion and heat,at 50thou crank movement I would think the mains would be binding or the crank about to break.
1965 Belvedere 2 426 Wedge.

Climate change,global warming,the biggest tax raising scam ever devised by man for mankind.

Motivating Our People,Accelerating Rapidly.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

440 source say 30 thou , 50 thou sounds good then.

:thumbright:
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

60 :thumbright:
From the man that runs Muscle motors
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
mopar_mark
Posts: 6738
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 06 8:01 pm
Location: Windlesham, Surrey

Post by mopar_mark »

0.050"/0.060"will be sufficient, there is not a great deal of expansion in that area of the rod. If there was then your rod bolts wouldn't be doing there job......... and your rods would be in "frightened of the dark territory" and no amount of clearance can stop them when they want to punch a hole :shock:
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Julian , what yer building for the jensen?

:atthemovies:
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

I bet you'll be happy....quick too :D 8-)
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
Post Reply