Hemi A body at the Nat's

Mopar related chat and bench racing

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
DaveB
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:22 pm
Location: Thorne,Donny
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

Not for me,if I wanted a new car,Id buy a new car :lol:
User avatar
comeonsasha
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 13 11:27 am
Location: mark lives in Angmering
Contact:

Post by comeonsasha »

I agree with blue , gonna go down this route with my satellite...
User avatar
mopar_mark
Posts: 6738
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 06 8:01 pm
Location: Windlesham, Surrey

Post by mopar_mark »

Blue wrote:They've gone to all that work with the lovely smooth panels but left the shaggin' wiper motor & wiring sticking out like a carbuncle! Even I'm capable of hiding that! Very tidy install otherwise.
Phew, glad it wasn't just me thinking that....

As said by Blue, great install
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."
User avatar
Jim
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:08 pm
Location: Hayling Island, Hants
Contact:

Post by Jim »

I agree about the wiper motor..... but I definitely prefer the EFI to carbing the motor. Dropping a carb on it would be a backward step. There's loads of potential with modern EFI.
User avatar
RobTwin
Posts: 13915
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 05 5:05 pm
Location: just north of Watford

Post by RobTwin »

Jim wrote:I agree about the wiper motor..... but I definitely prefer the EFI to carbing the motor. Dropping a carb on it would be a backward step. There's loads of potential with modern EFI.
Yes but I'd prefer a more aesthetically pleasing option. That 'bunch of bananas' doesn't do anything for me :?

Wouldn't mind the car tho, top notch work 8-)

I'd just keep the hood shut ;)
Image
User avatar
Ivor
Site Admin
Posts: 13000
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:11 pm
Location: The village of Evenley

Post by Ivor »

Blue wrote:Yea, I'd prefer to see a carb on there, that modern bunch of bananas intake don't look right to me either
If you get rid of the wiper motor, surely the brake master cylinder/servo has to go too? :roll:
The pump don’t work coz the vandals took the handles.

www.ivorsroadrunner.com
User avatar
Cannonball
Posts: 17242
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:26 pm
Location: crewe, cheshire
Contact:

Post by Cannonball »

RobTwin wrote:
Jim wrote:I agree about the wiper motor..... but I definitely prefer the EFI to carbing the motor. Dropping a carb on it would be a backward step. There's loads of potential with modern EFI.
Yes but I'd prefer a more aesthetically pleasing option. That 'bunch of bananas' doesn't do anything for me :?

Wouldn't mind the car tho, top notch work 8-)

I'd just keep the hood shut ;)
time to wake up n smell the coffe rob, modern tech blows the doors of old hat, people are wringing out phenominal hp from the modern breed of engines 2000 hp is possible with some reliability you just will not get that from some old shagger 60,s cast iron block odd looking intake or not, ;)
www.dwatts80.fsnet.co.uk

WATTS RACING TRANSMISSIONS, CLOBBER THE COMPETITION ITS CLOBBERIN TIME

OFTEN OUTNUMBERED NEVER OUTGUNNED,

HEY WHATS THE TOP END ON THAT SUPERSPORTS. UNLIMITED,

I HAVE A NVQW

LIFE GOES PRETTY FAST, IF YOU DONT LOOK ROUND A WHILE YOU MAY JUST MISS IT,

THE PASS IS THE JUICE,

LOVED BY FEW,
HATED BY MANY
RESPECTED BY ALL
User avatar
Adrian Worman
Posts: 4376
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 10 1:23 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Adrian Worman »

I think it's a good concept, I'm still planning on doin similar to the Barracuda, only for a tenner :D
Jesus built my hot rod

72 Challenger
65 Barracuda
User avatar
Ivor
Site Admin
Posts: 13000
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:11 pm
Location: The village of Evenley

Post by Ivor »

Crikey Duncan you're up early, got a new paper round? :D

I agree with you by the way, modern tech is the way to go really fast, reliably...
The pump don’t work coz the vandals took the handles.

www.ivorsroadrunner.com
User avatar
Jim
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:08 pm
Location: Hayling Island, Hants
Contact:

Post by Jim »

You tell 'em Dunc..!
Guy
Posts: 5002
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:20 pm
Location: Behind a Camera

Post by Guy »

Pete wrote:I bet that is also running an Alterkation or similar, lots of money spent there...very nice.
Yep the missing shock towers are a dead giveaway :thumbright:
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14438
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

Yep EFI on a vintage style intake, best of both worlds. Thing is, you're putting it into an old car because you like the look of it, so the motor needs too look right too IMO.
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

Too Sanitary yeah clean but oh so Doctors surgery plain

Why not bung a modern Hilborn Injection on a vintage intake still ECU controlled but stonkin lookin 8-)
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
RobTwin
Posts: 13915
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 05 5:05 pm
Location: just north of Watford

Post by RobTwin »

Blue wrote:Yep EFI on a vintage style intake, best of both worlds. Thing is, you're putting it into an old car because you like the look of it, so the motor needs too look right too IMO.
Quite. You wouldn't stick a modern Bentley engine in a 1929 Blower Bentley, just cos it's more efficient. Or would you.... :-k


Having said that, I'm not against the principle at all, just the look of that particular modern hemi's intake runners. Or whatever they are...
Image
User avatar
Dave-R
Posts: 24752
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:23 pm
Location: Dave Robson lives in Geordieland
Contact:

Post by Dave-R »

AllKiller wrote: Why not bung a modern Hilborn Injection on a vintage intake still ECU controlled but stonkin lookin 8-)
Yes. Sequential EFI using a Hilborn setup would be my dream induction. But they are VERY expensive. :(
Post Reply