Four Wheel Drive Drag Race Cars

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

I think you have your winter project :thumbright:
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
User avatar
latil
Posts: 12076
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 05 10:37 pm
Location: Steve Pearson MMA/014. East Grinstead and Carmarthen.

Post by latil »

FWD Formula 1 cars were banned because of their advantage over RWD. Better traction/acceleration and,irrelevant here,cornering. There couldn't have been many concerns over the extra weight and power losses.
1965 Belvedere 2 426 Wedge.

Climate change,global warming,the biggest tax raising scam ever devised by man for mankind.

Motivating Our People,Accelerating Rapidly.
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

.................or work on the basis that if the idea had practical merit someone would have already done it :read2:

I gues Brunel didn't work on that basis then! :D

That would be interesting Jon.
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
Jon Benn

Post by Jon Benn »

Martin, as Steve says you have to compensate for extra drive lines and loss of power through gears, somewhere I have a write up on Don Garlits Sidewinder, they took a known combination, turned the Hemi through 90 degrees and lost HUGE amounts of power through the extra gears needed to drive the wheels. I'll see if I can find it for you.
User avatar
TyreFryer
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:25 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

Post by TyreFryer »

Pete wrote:.................or work on the basis that if the idea had practical merit someone would have already done it :read2:
I guess Brunel didn't work on that basis then! :D

That would be interesting Jon.
Martin Walker
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

TyreFryer wrote:
Pete wrote:.................or work on the basis that if the idea had practical merit someone would have already done it :read2:
I guess Brunel didn't work on that basis then! :D


I would think Brunel's R&D budget was a bit bigger than yours ;)

I am all for trying new things, other than Line dancing, voting tory and homosexuality; but you have to be realistic on what you can achieve (or in my case under-achieve)
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
User avatar
TyreFryer
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:25 pm
Location: Leighton Buzzard

Post by TyreFryer »

Pete wrote:I would think Brunel's R&D budget was a bit bigger than yours ;)
Absolutely, talking theory here though Pete, that doesn't cost anything. :) Just wonder WHY nobody has tried it, even back in the earlier days of drag racing.

Thanks Julian, that's interesting.
Martin Walker
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

This makes very good reading on power and loss through drive trains :read2:

http://www.superstang.com/horsepower.htm

And did anyone else notice that HP and TQ figures always cross @ 5,252 RPM ?
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
Kev
Posts: 13955
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:04 pm
Location: Brisbane, Oz.

Post by Kev »

Pete wrote:[ I am all for trying new things, other than Line dancing, voting tory and homosexuality; )
Glad to see you would consider Morris Dancing, Pete :thumbright:
<center>
The name is Kev, nowadays known as Kevvy or Pommie C***!</center>
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

I'd be up for that if I could slap Barrymore around (in a non sexual manner)....
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
User avatar
Holly
Posts: 7029
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 04 9:22 pm
Location: Lost in music

Post by Holly »

lol, got gay on the brain, Pete?

Martin - on the traction side of this coin its worth noting that FWD drag cars run faster than AWD cars with the same amount of HP at the engine
Post Reply