Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 4:48 pm
by TyreFryer
Evidently when that Rolls was built the cost of it was in comparison 4 times what it would have been today, i.e. a £250,000 Rolls today would by comparison cost £1,000,000!
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 4:49 pm
by Ivor
Sorry, we've hijacked Martin's thread...

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 4:55 pm
by Stu
TyreFryer wrote:Evidently when that Rolls was built the cost of it was in comparison 4 times what it would have been today, i.e. a £250,000 Rolls today would by comparison cost £1,000,000!
Eh?

Are you saying that it was Veyron-esque in that it was more expensive to make than sell? Or that it would cost 4 x more to build today if the same practices were applied?

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 5:04 pm
by TyreFryer
No, I mean by comparison to the rate of inflation, it cost four times more to buy in 1934 than it would today.
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 5:09 pm
by Stu
Oh, I see!

Depreciation is a terrible thing!

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 7:21 pm
by Philth
What was the big Austin with the RR engine?
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 7:27 pm
by latil
Vanden Plas Princess 4 litre R.
Looked like a big Cambridge and rusted quicker than the speed of light.
http://www.co-oc.org/VP4R.html
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 08 11:06 pm
by TyreFryer
No, No Steve, it was the Austin Champ!
http://www.austinchamp.com/ 