Re: Morgans 68 Charger. Engine #3...
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 19 11:58 am
Morning all...
Been a bit of a delay; not had a chance to sort the vacuum out yet but will update when I do.
This mornings fun was 'compression check' - basically following some long and VERY useful conversations over 'what else to do while engine is out for rear seal' (you know who you are; thankyou ! ) it was suggested a compression check would be a good place to start.
After all, engine has had 'a life' and had a lot of 'sniff' so a compression check would give me an idea if rings were hanging in there...
Interesting results actually - learned quite a lot this morning.
1) Learned that there are loads of variables for converting compression ration to PSI readings - so really its a 'ballpark thing'. Obvs the higher the compression ratio the higher the PSI. Its more about an even spread.
2) My observations suggest that as I worked through my readings fell by about 20psi - I have concluded that as the smell of fuel increased (and the rings got wet) the pressure dropped slightly. In fact I retested the first one at the end and the drop was just that - 20psi between reading #1 and #2.
I remember from my rotary days, once you flood a rotary engine you just cant get it to start - they have no compression if 'wet'. Assume this is the same phenomenon.
So - results dont look too bad. Its all squashing.
(Although not 'within 10%' - but there is fudge-factor ambiguity here. Will run control tomorrow.)
Conclusions -
- All cylinders hold pressure.
- Highest was 175psi (195 dry)
- Lowest was 155psi
Compression ratio ~10.5ish:1
Been a bit of a delay; not had a chance to sort the vacuum out yet but will update when I do.
This mornings fun was 'compression check' - basically following some long and VERY useful conversations over 'what else to do while engine is out for rear seal' (you know who you are; thankyou ! ) it was suggested a compression check would be a good place to start.
After all, engine has had 'a life' and had a lot of 'sniff' so a compression check would give me an idea if rings were hanging in there...
Interesting results actually - learned quite a lot this morning.
1) Learned that there are loads of variables for converting compression ration to PSI readings - so really its a 'ballpark thing'. Obvs the higher the compression ratio the higher the PSI. Its more about an even spread.
2) My observations suggest that as I worked through my readings fell by about 20psi - I have concluded that as the smell of fuel increased (and the rings got wet) the pressure dropped slightly. In fact I retested the first one at the end and the drop was just that - 20psi between reading #1 and #2.
I remember from my rotary days, once you flood a rotary engine you just cant get it to start - they have no compression if 'wet'. Assume this is the same phenomenon.
So - results dont look too bad. Its all squashing.

Conclusions -
- All cylinders hold pressure.
- Highest was 175psi (195 dry)
- Lowest was 155psi
Compression ratio ~10.5ish:1