Clives 1970 Charger RT May Progress

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Mon Apr 20, 09 9:30 pm

Yep. They certainly did.

Most won't like this (

) but 70 was the best year for options on a Charger.
4-speed pistol grip
High impact colours
440-6
High Backed Buckets
Hood Pins
Hood callouts
Go wing
Exceteraaa exceteraaaa exceteraaaaa

That was the year Chargers could actually LOOK like a muscle car as well as go like one.

I await the barrage of abuse

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Mon Apr 20, 09 10:08 pm

charger01 · Post by **charger01** » Mon Apr 20, 09 10:15 pm

Don't forget about the proper leccy doors on the lights not like the inferior 68/69s

70

Dave999 · Post by **Dave999** » Tue Apr 21, 09 9:51 am

Clivey wrote:
That was the year Chargers could actually LOOK like a muscle car as well as go like one.

I await the barrage of abuse

and some design input from the man who designed the rear end of the aussie charger......But he mainly worked on the 72

----> you have exceptional taste

dAVE

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Tue Apr 21, 09 10:43 am

Clivey wrote:Yep. They certainly did.

Most won't like this ( ) but 70 was the best year for options on a Charger.
Go wing
Exceteraaa exceteraaaa exceteraaaaa

I await the barrage of abuse

Go Wing .... yet another Ford part on a MoPar, after Magnum 500's.

Wait a minute, shurely shome mishtake.

Don't tell me your car will have Magnum 500's as well as a Go Wing ?

It has become an honourary Mustang ?

Plus, I can't find an 'Exceteraaa exceteraaaa exceteraaaaa' online anywhere in an options list ????

Was this the secret 'ohmigodwhathavewedonewiththefront' option where a 68 or 69 grille could be retrofitted

Gasp.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Tue Apr 21, 09 11:02 am

Ouch. That hurt

RobTwin · Post by **RobTwin** » Tue Apr 21, 09 1:13 pm

Sandy wrote:
Go Wing .... yet another Ford part on a MoPar, after Magnum 500's.

Wait a minute, shurely shome mishtake.

Don't tell me your car will have Magnum 500's as well as a Go Wing ?

I'm hoping the Go Wing is one of the options Clivey ISNT fitting

Dont suit b-bodies

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Tue Apr 21, 09 1:34 pm

Plus, everyone always fits them with the wing horizontal

They are supposed to be cranked over at an angle ....

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Tue Apr 21, 09 8:11 pm

Didnt think that query would raise such a debate.

As for all the options available on the 70, well they had to do something to make up for the front end

(which STILL reminds me of the manah manah muppets:lol: )

I think history shows:

68= almost there
69= spot on
70= over did it/shoulda left it

Only kiddin Clivey

Rogue Trooper · Post by **Rogue Trooper** » Tue Apr 21, 09 8:16 pm

Phill Phill Phill :violent3:

steveo · Post by **steveo** » Tue Apr 21, 09 10:23 pm

Phill440 wrote: Didnt think that query would raise such a debate.

As for all the options available on the 70, well they had to do something to make up for the front end (which STILL reminds me of the manah manah muppets:lol: )

I think history shows:

68= almost there
69= spot on
70= over did it/shoulda left it

Only kiddin Clivey

thought 69 was the last year for a charger

all joking aside ...think clivey is sort of right ..well better interior & options

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Wed Apr 22, 09 7:50 am

Thats what everyone who bought one thought. Imagine how gutted they were when the 70 turned up. I bet they felt well cheated.

I mean, who on gods earth hinges a glove box door at the top. How retarded is THAT!

RobTwin · Post by **RobTwin** » Wed Apr 22, 09 8:23 am

same as on our Satellite

Safety feature, apparently......

steveo · Post by **steveo** » Wed Apr 22, 09 9:02 am

Clivey wrote:Thats what everyone who bought one thought. Imagine how gutted they were when the 70 turned up. I bet they felt well cheated.

I mean, who on gods earth hinges a glove box door at the top. How retarded is THAT!

.......

..........

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Wed Apr 22, 09 9:20 am

I love my car and thats that