Page 3 of 6

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 3:22 pm
by 1stpop
ok then 440 time
im getting a
Mopar 440 currently in parts,
1973 440RB block, all ready and machined for reassembly, with new hone and line hone and magna fluxed, also hot tanked so back to cast iron ready for new paint, currently oiled and rapped up from machinist,
with forged crank (also been magnafluxed), hemi rods (all fully prepped),
906 Heads by the Koffels in Ohio, also hot tanked and magnafluxed, they are fully ported and polished with 2.14int and 1.81 exh valves, I have valves, valve springs, retainers & locks and also Crane adjustable rockers for them. The machine shop also installed new valve guides,

i have a chance to get a tunnel ram with twin 650 cfms ,
whats your thoughts on this set up .
what cam would you get cheers guys.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 3:26 pm
by Les Szabo
Darren, to give you an idea.. I had a stock 440 with 6-pak rods, stock compression at around 10.3:1.....906 heads ported by Hauser with 2.14" inlet and 1.81" exhaust valves, a Comp Cams .650" solid cam, an 850 carb in the '69 Cuda weighing approx 3200lbs with me in it and it went 10.7 in the quarter on motor with 4.88 gears and Race 727 auto.

You should be able to do similar with less cam and gears.

Les

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 3:31 pm
by 1stpop
sounds like i may new pants as well lez :thumbright:

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 3:43 pm
by Les Szabo
nah mate, you'll get used it, just take it easy for the 1st passes down the track, make sure the car goes straight before you use all the power, use your head, and ease in to it, you'll be fine, and be careful on the street with it..there'll be upwards of 500hp on tap in quite a light car........Les

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 5:36 pm
by Jon Connolly
Hi 1st pop



Best of luck whichever way you choose :thumbright:

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 6:01 pm
by Cannonball
Les Szabo wrote:Darren, to give you an idea.. I had a stock 440 with 6-pak rods, stock compression at around 10.3:1.....906 heads ported by Hauser with 2.14" inlet and 1.81" exhaust valves, a Comp Cams .650" solid cam, an 850 carb in the '69 Cuda weighing approx 3200lbs with me in it and it went 10.7 in the quarter on motor with 4.88 gears and Race 727 auto.

You should be able to do similar with less cam and gears.

Les
Bananarama! hell less you dont look like a 500lb man, :shock: ;)

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 6:58 pm
by Les Szabo
Cannonball wrote:
Les Szabo wrote:Darren, to give you an idea.. I had a stock 440 with 6-pak rods, stock compression at around 10.3:1.....906 heads ported by Hauser with 2.14" inlet and 1.81" exhaust valves, a Comp Cams .650" solid cam, an 850 carb in the '69 Cuda weighing approx 3200lbs with me in it and it went 10.7 in the quarter on motor with 4.88 gears and Race 727 auto.

You should be able to do similar with less cam and gears.

Les
Bananarama! hell less you dont look like a 500lb man, :shock: ;)
Hey Dunc..you reckon the '69 was 2700lb's then?...I would've thought it was around 2950>3000lb + me 205lb's

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 8:50 pm
by Cannonball
Les Szabo wrote:
Cannonball wrote:
Les Szabo wrote:Darren, to give you an idea.. I had a stock 440 with 6-pak rods, stock compression at around 10.3:1.....906 heads ported by Hauser with 2.14" inlet and 1.81" exhaust valves, a Comp Cams .650" solid cam, an 850 carb in the '69 Cuda weighing approx 3200lbs with me in it and it went 10.7 in the quarter on motor with 4.88 gears and Race 727 auto.

You should be able to do similar with less cam and gears.

Les
Bananarama! hell less you dont look like a 500lb man, :shock: ;)
Hey Dunc..you reckon the '69 was 2700lb's then?...I would've thought it was around 2950>3000lb + me 205lb's
well i always thought that a bodies were the racers choice because they are light to start with, now i would imagine you chased the best possible et and weight = performance for free
bri,s cuda weighs 2800 and that is backhalved but all the tinwork in steel wheel tubs rear floors etc not ally so has a heavy arse also its running a dry sump setup with loads of braided lines and his engine sump alone weighs 2 stone so his is heavy for what it is his gutted out 68 charger was 2920 so i would figure a dart/barracuda to be circa 2700-2800

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 9:02 pm
by Les Szabo
You could be right mate....I had all ally rear work, no inner fenders, perspex windows...l/bars coil overs......maybe....that makes it say 3000lb then with me in it...

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 9:22 pm
by Dave-R
I still think he will run mid 11s with the 509 cam. And i shall remind you all I said that after the event. :P

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 9:49 pm
by Cannonball
Les Szabo wrote:You could be right mate....I had all ally rear work, no inner fenders, perspex windows...l/bars coil overs......maybe....that makes it say 3000lb then with me in it...
i would reckon so les. i think mags baileys barracuda weighs in around 3700 but he does have a tube front and backhalf,
do you know his car its silver think its gone 9,1s now its a crackin looking car,

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 10:48 pm
by Les Szabo
You mean 2700lbs.....no, don't know it mate, there's lots of cars I don't know about now, as rarely went back till last years Nats..got any pics and some spec?....sounds interesting at 9.1.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 11:44 pm
by Guy
Heres Mark's Barracuda , a really well prepaired car.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 12 11:53 pm
by Cannonball
Les Szabo wrote:You mean 2700lbs.....no, don't know it mate, there's lots of cars I don't know about now, as rarely went back till last years Nats..got any pics and some spec?....sounds interesting at 9.1.
yes 2,700 sorry sweet car

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 12 12:11 am
by Pete
I ran an 11.6 in a 2838lb '67 Dart with an iron headed 440 motor with a hydraulic 509 cam...........