Posted: Sat Dec 20, 08 10:47 pm
JesusBudgie wrote:Back on thread
:
Page 4 of 26
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 08 10:58 pm
Budge will do son 
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 08 11:01 pm
Back on thread 
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 08 11:26 pm
Adam,
i read that with a 800 roller cam your combo is good for 850 hp and 1000 hp and 725TQ are easily possible
lower comp motors with 700 rollers about 800hp and 700ish tq
but it did mention using O ringed copper head gaskets with nitrous use or compression over 14:1
i read that with a 800 roller cam your combo is good for 850 hp and 1000 hp and 725TQ are easily possible
lower comp motors with 700 rollers about 800hp and 700ish tq
but it did mention using O ringed copper head gaskets with nitrous use or compression over 14:1
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 2:07 am
Same cylinder Budge.......................Abracadabra , puff..........................Budgie wrote:Can't see the liner now........how did he do that then
Bet you're real confused Budge.
Still need more clearance.
Picked the rod bearings up from the main Chebby man today (Jeff Bull) , some workshop that mans got , think i'm converted
, great bloke , could'nt get No Neck out the place. , had the pleasure of lookin @ all the engines ready to go out the door , serious bits of kit.Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 2:20 am
Steve , don't need the block O ringed till around 14:1 or untill DC predicts (IVC) , only running 9:2 so will be good for the MSL gaskets , DC is around 8:1 , so a good safe combo , will also be a peach to tune for the sniff.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 2:28 am
See where yer comin from Jim , yer lookin @ #1 main saddle , #2.3 & 4 are cross bolted.challenger wrote:how come 4 bolt mains aint used on a mega block
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 9:18 am
Adam, So with that 4.625 Arm and 4.500 bore your @ 588 ci now 
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 12:14 pm
No Steve , 4.562 bore.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 12:22 pm
secrete son, you didnt look hard enoughBudgie wrote:Can't see the liner now
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 1:33 pm
AllKiller wrote:Adam, So with that 4.625 Arm and 4.500 bore your @ 588 ci now
That will be 604 thenBrutus wrote:No Steve , 4.562 bore.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 2:34 pm
Yep, 9.91 litres.mopar_mark wrote:AllKiller wrote:Adam, So with that 4.625 Arm and 4.500 bore your @ 588 ci nowThat will be 604 thenBrutus wrote:No Steve , 4.562 bore.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 3:07 pm
Here ya go Brutus,Brutus wrote:Blue, threw the old steel alt pulley away & had a billet one made up
This is my Alt pulley
While I had the camera out, thought I would snap one of the new aluminium flywheel/flex plate to replace the Heavy JW Wheel.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 3:35 pm
4.625, isnt that the absolute limit on that block Adam ?
Mark, Mick .....
4.5 x 4.500 = 572
4.5 x 4.625 = 588
4.5 x 4,750 = 604
Mark, Mick .....
4.5 x 4.500 = 572
4.5 x 4.625 = 588
4.5 x 4,750 = 604
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 08 3:52 pm
Steve, you are getting your bores & strokes mixed upAllKiller wrote:4.625, isnt that the absolute limit on that block Adam ?
AllKiller wrote:Mark, Mick .....
4.5 x 4.500 = 572
4.5 x 4.625 = 588
4.5 x 4,750 = 604
My motor is square bore & stroke (4 1/2" x 4 1/2") = 572ci
Adams Bore is 4.562" with 4 5/8" Crank = 604.6725185370001 to be precise or 9.9 Litres if you prefer