Mopar Muscle Association UK

Sadly it's not the first and won't be the last, Clivey.............people, ehhh?

As ever, it's the victims that matter the most.......

I just saw photos on the News of three of the women who claimed Jimmy Savile interfered with them.
They showed a current picture of each woman alongside a photo of what they looked like at the time.

The caption along the bottom read "Now, then. Now, then. Now, then."

sorry, but that got me dave

his last request was for his ashes to go in an etch- a- sketch-


so that kids could still fiddle with his k**b

Cliff jokes coming soon.....

i now reckon we could save a lot of time here if we made a list of 70’s / 80’s tv / celebrities / presenters / whatever who are NOT paedophiles

We've started a sweepstake at work over who will be named next.

I've drawn Alvin Stardust and my mate has got "Little and Large".

Mabe we should start one here. £1 each in?

I'd never have guessed Stuart Hall

My money's on the Krankies. I reckon there was summat going on between those two...

the whole thing is very grim indeed, this sort of people are obviously not very well in the head, they had the financial means to screw as many women as they needed to fulfill the desires it was only a phone call away, but to prey on either young children or mentaly unbalanced and even the dead is Bananarama! disgustin, and most viewers way back when looked up to them,

really Bananarama! me off,

MY Money is on Mr Blobby....perfect cover a bit like a twisted Santa.

Stuart Hall is the only one so far that has actually shocked me. It stopped me dead in my tracks that one.

.....so who's the 6th person arrested?


I reckon its Matthew Corbett! Apparently the police received an anonymous tip off from a small yellow bear and a grey dog with black ears that Matthew fisted them religiously during the 70's.


Crikey!

I think the acid test is.....even before this came out......would you have ever let Mr Saville babysit your kids??

I am gonna go out on a limb here and say 'why not'? If you have no reason so suspect your kids are in danger, where would the problem be?

Prior to this all coming to light, the facts were: He wore gaudy clothes, loads of jewellery, lived with his mum, wasnt known to be in a relationship with anyone (possibly giving the appearance of a 'confirmed batchelor') smoked cigars, AND, raised loads of money for kids charities, ran marathons every year for em, his shows focussed on making kids dreams come true, and he had a campaign for road safety.

To the uninitiated looking in, all of the above DOES NOT add up to a nonce. It adds up to a bloke who is eccentric. Weird even. But a bloke who SEEMS to be entirely selfless in his endeavours to help others. THAT is what is so sisnister about the whole sordid affair. There just dont seem to be any rules around any of this. Bottom line is, anyone can be one, and a true nonce will go to extreme lengths in the art of diversion.

I wouldnt....a lot of people with these inclinations deliberately put themselves into situations that allow easy access to kids and opportunities to build trust with both the kids and the parents/ carers.... They get to a point where they hope that if the victim speaks out they wont be believed because the alleged perpetrator couldnt possibly do that....Fortunately, DNA retrieval techniques and the results of their analysis are now widely known and the vast majority of potential offenders limit their actions to internet activity..... things that werent around in the 60s and 70s. The dilema is that the internet can allow potential offenders to fullfill their desires without physically harming our children, but the (obvious) other side of the coin is that at some point, children are the victims of the production of child pornography and the internet may be producing more paedophiles. Curiosity can turn to any level of offending and the net has definately facilitated this! The worst side of this is being Policed but its a huge problem and dont think for one minute our children are completely safe..... We need to concentrate on good old responsible parenting skills....ie making sure you know where your kids are, what they are doing with their phones, noticing any differences in their behaviour/ confidence, monitoring facebook, etc etc.

Ive said before, this is a huge, complex subject and proper discussion is probably not what this forum is for but believe me....i wouldnt have let him babysit my kids!

Steve wrote:I wouldnt....a lot of people with these inclinations deliberately put themselves into situations that allow easy access to kids and opportunities to build trust with both the kids and the parents/ carers.... They get to a point where they hope that if the victim speaks out they wont be believed because the alleged perpetrator couldnt possibly do that....Fortunately, DNA retrieval techniques and the results of their analysis are now widely known and the vast majority of potential offenders limit their actions to internet activity..... things that werent around in the 60s and 70s. The dilema is that the internet can allow potential offenders to fullfill their desires without physically harming our children, but the (obvious) other side of the coin is that at some point, children are the victims of the production of child pornography and the internet may be producing more paedophiles. Curiosity can turn to any level of offending and the net has definately facilitated this! The worst side of this is being Policed but its a huge problem and dont think for one minute our children are completely safe..... We need to concentrate on good old responsible parenting skills....ie making sure you know where your kids are, what they are doing with their phones, noticing any differences in their behaviour/ confidence, monitoring facebook, etc etc.

Ive said before, this is a huge, complex subject and proper discussion is probably not what this forum is for but believe me....i wouldnt have let him babysit my kids!

Be honest.........Despite many letters about being Evil Knievel for a day, Jim never fixed it for you did he!