The wierdest thing about that is the modern engine! i think the Charger looks good as a vert, dispite being an anty vert person.
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 08 10:33 pm
by Anonymous
Verts are for hairdressers
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 08 10:39 pm
by TYREMAN
John wrote:Verts are for hairdressers
Or Camp people!....suprised you dont have one John!
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 08 11:07 pm
by Anonymous
Now yer scarin' me "T"
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 08 11:11 pm
by TYREMAN
SORRY John! got you mixed up with Ray
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 7:27 am
by RayC
TYREMAN wrote:SORRY John! got you mixed up with Ray
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 7:59 am
by the dodge
ruined a good car in my opinion - might as well of lee'd it,
not keen on soft tops myself, you always tend to see drivers with the top down more on warmish winters days (like the other weekend) and the top up on the hottest sunniest days we have weird? but hey each to their own
but that car would look better with a period engine
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 11:18 am
by phil442
John wrote:Verts are for hairdressers
OI
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 12:14 pm
by steveo
no thats so wrong .. second generation with out a roof ...... the guys put a lot of time & Good work in on it though .... each to their own but defo not for me
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 6:07 pm
by Anonymous
i think steve is right that is just wrong in so many way apart from the challys and cuda and also the furys and stuff im not a fan of any other soft top mopar especally the charger
he has put a lot of effort into that car for sure but in the wrong places that engine is just wrong
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 08 9:14 pm
by Gringo
John wrote:Verts are for hairdressers
And Dale Winton...
And why is it that putting a modern Hemi in a car means you can display a Hemi badge, numberplate, etc. on your car. To me its a BIG let down when you look under the hood and its not a 426, but instead its a 5.7L with plastic all over the top. Pants if you ask me. But you probably didn't...