Gears.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Anonymous

Gears.

Post by Anonymous »

Anyone tell me if there is a vast difference on street/motorway,between 3.23 gays & 3.9s.
:thumbright:
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Don't wanna go for the 3.9s,but I think it's time. :cry:
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22109
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

Use Dave Robson's Auto maths calculator off his Challenger site.
I would guess it would be worth about another 500rpm....
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks Pete,I had a feeling you would pop up,you knew I would change them gears in the end. :thumbright:
User avatar
RobTwin
Posts: 13848
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 05 5:05 pm
Location: just north of Watford

Post by RobTwin »

3.23's are great for road use but I wouldnt want to go any more 'radical' than 3.91's if you're planning to do as many miles as you currently do.

Our mph/rpm works out about 70mph at 3500rpm with 3.91's. So motorway cruising gets a bit frantic any faster than that :(

I remember doing 100 at 4000 in the Satellite when we had 3.23's (ssshh :-$ dont tell Matt)..... took up both lanes of the A1 tho :shock:

Better start saving for a bit of Gear Vendors kit......
Image
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Rob'I take it Stu was driving @ 100 MPH :D
User avatar
RobTwin
Posts: 13848
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 05 5:05 pm
Location: just north of Watford

Post by RobTwin »

Come to think of it, I dont think I was even there that day ;)
Image
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22109
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

Remember tyre height is a major factor here.

When I had the Daytona with the factory Dana & 4.10's and 14" original tyres, the car would only do 85mph taking into account a standard 5200 rev limit.
Whack on the 275 x 60 x 15" tyres and that was up to a (theorhetical) 109mph ;) .

You have very tall tyres so that will mitigate the effect a lot whilst having tall gears for a good launch and 60 foot time.
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks Mr Wiseman :thumbright:
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

And if you ran a 28" tall slick at the track, it would be even better! There's nothing like a set of 3.91's or 4.10's to really wake a car up. I have 4.10's and 29" tall street tyres, and I'm happy to cruise at 70 on the motorway.
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Blue'I'm using 28" tall Hoosiers,so should be good then? :thumbright:
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

I reckon.
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:57 pm
Location: Matt Snowball, Tongham Surrey

Post by Matt »

to calculate the difference in rpm at a particular speed ,

3.9 divided by 3.23 is 1.21

hence, for the same road speed, your engine will be spinning 1.21 times faster with the 3.9's than with the 3.23's

if you're currently turning 3000 rpm at cruise , new rpm is 3000x1.21 = 3630
630 higher

if you're at 2500 currently, new rpm is 2500 x 1.21 = 3025
525 higher .


Absolute road speed per engine rpm (as previously stated in this thread) is dependent on tyre rolling diameter as well as axle ratio (well mainly these two, anyway) , and is a different calculation.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks Matt,useful bit of calculating :thumbright:
Post Reply