Why are 60 fts so important

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

reaction dont matter, unless your heads up racing, in the same class,
with those 60's, you ve not enough power to get near Kev :D
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

pete walton wrote:This a copy of my last run at the nats.reaction.4048,,,,,,,,60ft 2.0831,,,,,,,330ft 5.9462,,,,,,,,,1/8 8.8562,,,,,,,,,1/8 mph 86.53mph,,,,,,,,,1000 et 11.1961,,,,,,,et 13.2612 mph 113.70. I would guess if i had not had a cup of tea and a biscuit on the line that could have been a chuffing good time poss fastest a bod.
Julies Dart ran 11.6 @ 112mph at the Nats.
Went 11.4 @ 117mph at Shakey with a 1.5 60 foot time.

A bit to go yet, Pete ;)

When Dave & Mags Bailey are running we are not even in the Ballpark..........
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

My 60 was 1.755 ET 12.008 @ 115.510 :roll:
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
Kev
Posts: 13955
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:04 pm
Location: Brisbane, Oz.

Post by Kev »

1.58 on me 11.72 run :thumbright:
<center>
The name is Kev, nowadays known as Kevvy or Pommie C***!</center>
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

pete walton wrote:I will get there Pete just got to make enough power to drag my massive wheels of the line :roll:
Pete , why are you running on those mahoosive wheels , genuine question , not tryin to be funny , cos I'm sure you'd get better results with another combo.

:drwho:
User avatar
Kev
Posts: 13955
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:04 pm
Location: Brisbane, Oz.

Post by Kev »

Very true Adam! But would you chop up an original 60's race car???? Work with what you have, Pete (and what gears are you running!!!!!!! Again!!!!!! :evil: )
<center>
The name is Kev, nowadays known as Kevvy or Pommie C***!</center>
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Yea , thought it must of been summat to do with it.

Can always experiment with different wheels though , when he beats you & Pete he can put the mahoosives back on.

:thumbright:
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

3.55 ?
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
User avatar
Dave999
Posts: 9561
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 05 10:31 am
Location: Twickenham,London, England

Post by Dave999 »

here is the maths that will work if a few things are constant

in reality your acceleration isn't but for back of fag packet calc to see if 1 second on 60 foot time = 2 seconds extra at the line

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion

the classic equations are easier to understand

A level stuff unless you did O'levels

GCSEs just involve drawing a picture of the thing in motion :) so if ya 35 or under you are screwed...

I know, i taught it (in english to children who couldn't speak english, i was supposed to i wasn't being spiteful).

I think if you use classic equations 1 and 4

where u is the speed at 60 foot V is the speed at the line

use equation 1 to work out average acceleration

R or S is the distance traveled 1/4 mile - 6o foot in this case
use meters, meters/second and meters per second squared for acceleration its easier

convert back to mph later

can't be arsed to do one.... i had to erase everything i learned to fit in idiocy, humour, how to rebuild a VW flat 4 and how to make things go bang

let me know if it works, i probably got it wrong...sbeen a long time

James!!!

integration diferentiation and stuff it scares me and I've lost me notes

dave
The Greater Knapweed near the Mugwort by the Buckthorn tree is dying
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks Dave.. :? ..............................................

:scratch: :-k :read2: :help:
User avatar
Dave999
Posts: 9561
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 05 10:31 am
Location: Twickenham,London, England

Post by Dave999 »

yeah it seemed like such a good idea then i thought.....i really can't be arsed too much like hard work

acceleration is the key

and maintaining it for the full 1/4

first 8th its accelerating a big lump of car as fast as poss
second 8th its overcoming the wind resistance that goes up exponentially with every mph. which is why a ford pop aint the best car to go drag racing in

to do it right and miantain the same acceleration for the full 1/4 you would need a very wide torque curve and a lotta gears

a variator gearbox like on a modern scooter would be the go.

dave
The Greater Knapweed near the Mugwort by the Buckthorn tree is dying
User avatar
Kev
Posts: 13955
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:04 pm
Location: Brisbane, Oz.

Post by Kev »

Pete wrote:When Dave & Mags Bailey are running we are not even in the Ballpark..........
Yeah! But they are hardly street driven to and from the track,eh? Oh! I forgot! Mr TrailerQueen!!!!!! :D :D
Reckon I could go 11.4 if I trailered my car!! :thumbright:
Should we have a "Trash Talk" section??? :D
<center>
The name is Kev, nowadays known as Kevvy or Pommie C***!</center>
Post Reply