Charger SE identification

Mopar related chat and bench racing

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Kev
Posts: 13955
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:04 pm
Location: Brisbane, Oz.

Post by Kev »

Tony's post was ace! This is the sort of nugget of info I have to wade through all the innuendo debris to get to. Top Hole, Tony! :thumbright:
<center>
The name is Kev, nowadays known as Kevvy or Pommie C***!</center>
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks to all of you guys who replied especially Tony for the in depth knowledge -- its refreshing to find people who genuinely want to assist -- this is my first American car (only had it 3 months) before i used to be in the TVR club (I HAD A 1973 3000M) but they seemed to be obsessed with who had the fastest or the most expensive and spent most of the time telling you how good theirs was


cheers
Steve
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Ace post Tony. Especially liked the closing remarks.

I think it confirms the 70 Charger as the best of the 3 gen 2's. :D A great year for engine and trim options, inside and out. :thumbright:

(and we all knw the real reson why Dave spits about the thought of having a B Bod. He has trouble parking the big cars so he goes for the smaller, compact jobs like the E Bods :lol: )
User avatar
steveo
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 05 11:16 am
Location: Kent

Post by steveo »

:study: blimey some real intresting info there TonyO , :thumbright: :thumbright:
User avatar
Dave-R
Posts: 24752
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:23 pm
Location: Dave Robson lives in Geordieland
Contact:

Post by Dave-R »

STEVE ADDISON wrote:but they seemed to be obsessed with who had the fastest or the most expensive and spent most of the time telling you how good theirs was
Let me tell you how great my car is....... :lol:
User avatar
Charger
Posts: 5235
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 05 11:40 am
Location: Manchester, UK MMA/921

Post by Charger »

fantastic post Tony, many thanks

my car too has a number of options over and above the standard ‘500’ spec, and I’m actually wondering just how many ’70 Charger 500’s actually left the show room as standard 500’s, not many I’ll wager!!

my car has also an SE medallion on the dash on the passenger side, the dash is black not wood grain, I think this must have been added by a previous keeper as I don’t believe they put an SE medallion there …
Si
1970 Charger 500
383 | 4bbl | 727 column | PAS | PAB | buckets/buddy - check out my photos HERE

If you don't want another same old brand-new car ... you could be DODGE MATERIAL

1970 Dodge Charger Registry - https://www.1970chargerregistry.com/
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Dave --No words necessary -- your picture speaks volumes
User avatar
Rogue Trooper
Posts: 1792
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 06 8:19 pm

Post by Rogue Trooper »

A great info post Tony, and i agree the 1970 500 is the mutts :D
1970 Charger 500
1934 Coupe
1954 F100
1972 Norton Commando Fastback

Your Mum Says Hi.

Mopar a God amongst insects.

Rule in Hell or be a Slave in Heaven.
TonyO
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:29 pm

se identification

Post by TonyO »

Blimey, thanks guys for all that support. It is hard not to go into anorak mode at times.I am really glad lots enjoyed the post. 70 Chargers are very cool. The intended 70 Daytonas would have been the coolest street cars out there.But thats history. Right now the Chargers that are fetching mucho high dollar are the SE 71 cars. These are usually packed with options and hide away lights etc, with a big block they are way cool, also you are not paying R/T money!!! buy the way 71 Super Bee's really rock as well.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Tony,

if there had of been a 70 Daytona, do you think it would have looked massively different from the 69? I can't see it being much more than a few tweaks as there couldnt have been any where else they could go. Did it ever make the drawing board before it was canned?
TonyO
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:29 pm

se identification

Post by TonyO »

Clive, you pose an interesting question.
Officially a Dodge Daytona could be ordered in 1970, infact its part of the Dodge Scat Pack sales offerings for that year. You may recall the literature, with many Mopar/Dodge drivers giving examples of the 70 models they liked. The gang were Garlits, Landy, Glotzback I think and Don White who took up the Daytona mantra. Very much like Dodge getting infront of themselves by offering a 71 T/A Challenger, I still think one or two exist, somewhere.
Back to the Tona, at least three 70 Daytonas have surfaced, all Six Pack cars, V coded. At least one is a fake, the other two look like factory pilot cars. Many folks do not believe any 70 Tona exisited. A certain brown car used by Dodge Public Relations for press releases definatley existed. Is it still with us, who knows. As with the whole wing car thing, there is a lot of miss information and fantasy. Everything from the actual numbers to how the cars were built are questionable.
However, remember this, Daytonas were delivered to dealers around April 69, they came with loads of 70 Charger parts.The nascar crown for 69 was won by Petty in a Ford, the Daytona, a 69 model won the 70 Nascar season. So it maked sense for Dodge to offer the Daytona in its 1970 line-up.
The 70 cars do not have a flush rear window, have the R/T hood scoops, 70 rear lights and mouldings and a loop front bumper, also in the interior department they are all 1970. Hi back seats, knob turning radios and woodgrain shifters, all three are auto cars and sunroofed!!Nice racing mirrors as well, the blue car has magnums but the green and brown cars have 15" Rallyes.
Infact Paul Harbournes Black Dayclona, would probably had been better built as a 70 car as he has kept the door scoops and rear light applique etc.
The crux is what and who to believe, just like the 1971 Superbirds!!
User avatar
steveo
Posts: 3920
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 05 11:16 am
Location: Kent

Post by steveo »

:thumbright: more intresting / fascinating info TonyO :read2: :thumbright:
seam to remember reading about a 70 plumb crazy 6 pack also ,had the nose & wing put on at a dealer , & it was documented in the sales contract from memory , might be getting mixed up with something else though :oops: :scratch:
User avatar
AllKiller
Posts: 15191
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 04 9:33 pm
Location: Hampshire

Post by AllKiller »

Lots of Info here
http://aerowarriors.com/70dcd.html

Image
Not sure about the stripe :cry:
ALL KILLER NO FILLER
Nostalgia, its not what it used to be.

Carbon footprint of a Saturn V
Image
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Thanks Tony, an interesting read. Being a member of the 70 Charger Registry, I do remember a lot of discussion about the authenticity of the claimed '70 Daytona's' that had surfaced at the odd show or two. Trouble is, its difficult to know what to believe just as you say.

Paul Harbourne's car is as I would imagine one. But much as I like the scoops on the 70 cars, they shouldnt really be on a Daytona as they serve no function whatsoever, and never could unlike the reverse facing ones on the 69 Tonas and 70 birds used for wheel / tyre clearance on the racng cars.
TonyO
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:29 pm

se identification

Post by TonyO »

The 70 Daytonas were to be built by Chrysler in-house, at the St louis plant, the plan was to keep the cars as R/T Chargers and just add on the other parts such as wing, nosecone etc. this would keep the costs down. Remember that Creative Industries did the conversions on the 69 Daytonas and it cost Chrysler muco dosh. The budget was never going to be that big again.
Post Reply