4 speed help please

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

4 speed help please

Post by db »

I'm confused. What the hell is the point of the front bearing retainer?

What does it do apart from guide any leaking fluid into the clutch? :?
Is has that long extension tube over the input shaft for what reason? Why don't they put another bearing near the end to support the shaft better?
The front bearing being a round ball type cannot prevent some rocking motion in the shaft so why does no-one make a twin ball or cylindrical type roller bearing conversion?

I'm wondering if it's possible to have a new retainer made which will hold a bigger or even 2x oil seals and maybe a bronze bush near the pointy end.

Or, is there something amiss inside the gearbox which should be preventing this movement in the shaft in the first place?
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

With the front housing off, the input shaft can be rocked by 0.5 degree or 0.1" at the pointy end.
Is something worn (bearings are all new) or is this normal???
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

It's normal Paul. The input shaft is held in the crank bushing so it can't move when it's installed.
1970 Road Runner, 505CI, 4 speed, GV overdrive, 3.91 gears.
11.98 @ 117mph on street tyres
VGVIP

Post by VGVIP »

The tube part also guides the throw out bearing if it is anything like the limited number of manual gearboxes I have worked on.

Agree about the movement.... you must have the bush in the end of the crank.
Not sure about mopar but some manufacturers leave the bush out on auto cars only inserting it on manual cars.
so if your is a conversion you will need to make sure you have inserted (the correct) bush
User avatar
Adrian Worman
Posts: 4376
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 10 1:23 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Adrian Worman »

I always use the roller bearing that was used in the late Dakota/Ram 360 and 318's, it fits all cranks without machining and supports the input shaft better and closer to the centre plate.
Jesus built my hot rod

72 Challenger
65 Barracuda
User avatar
Cannonball
Posts: 17242
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:26 pm
Location: crewe, cheshire
Contact:

Post by Cannonball »

something odd must be going on my 70 runner had a bollaxed crank bush and the trans never leaked
www.dwatts80.fsnet.co.uk

WATTS RACING TRANSMISSIONS, CLOBBER THE COMPETITION ITS CLOBBERIN TIME

OFTEN OUTNUMBERED NEVER OUTGUNNED,

HEY WHATS THE TOP END ON THAT SUPERSPORTS. UNLIMITED,

I HAVE A NVQW

LIFE GOES PRETTY FAST, IF YOU DONT LOOK ROUND A WHILE YOU MAY JUST MISS IT,

THE PASS IS THE JUICE,

LOVED BY FEW,
HATED BY MANY
RESPECTED BY ALL
User avatar
Philth
Posts: 857
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:48 pm
Location: Billericay, ESSEX.

Post by Philth »

Input shaft retainer supports the clutch throw-out bearing (acts as a slider).

It is gasketed to the box and also incorporates a shaft seal.

The crankshaft will also have a bearing in either sintered bronze or roller bearings and supports & guides the input shaft end nose in the crank for correct clutch alignment & support (this feature is only found on RWD manual cars, even to this very day!).

This has already all been said by much cleverer people than me but what the hell, eh! Had to replace the input shaft bearing & clutch on mine many moons ago when it used to he a 4 speed motor....
1973 Dodge Challenger
MMA 616
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

Thanks for the responses all.
I've had a couple of days to calm down from my original rant ;)

I've had a busy weekend so I've not even thought about it, which is no bad thing, so I'll start with a fresh brain in the next few days.

All part of the steep Mopar learning curve :thumbright:
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

I've checked the bearing in the crank- absolutely fine.
The only thing I can come up with is that the new oil seal from the kit is crap.
Gonna look up a better quality one.
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
latil
Posts: 12076
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 05 10:37 pm
Location: Steve Pearson MMA/014. East Grinstead and Carmarthen.

Post by latil »

What's the shaft like where the seal runs? Has the old seal worn the shaft a few thou in that area?
1965 Belvedere 2 426 Wedge.

Climate change,global warming,the biggest tax raising scam ever devised by man for mankind.

Motivating Our People,Accelerating Rapidly.
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

You may have damaged the seal when you slid the bearing retainer over the splines. Make sure the splines don't have any rough edges and try winding a layer of ptfe tape over the splines before you slide the retainer on.
1970 Road Runner, 505CI, 4 speed, GV overdrive, 3.91 gears.
11.98 @ 117mph on street tyres
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

Funnily enough Steve I've just checked a bike part I'm selling. I thought the seal had just polished it but it was worn from 40mm to 39.96.
I'll carefully check my shaft for grooves :oops:

Good point Mick, I'll be super-careful with my new seal, ordered today :thumbright:
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
Philth
Posts: 857
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:48 pm
Location: Billericay, ESSEX.

Post by Philth »

Can't quite remember but does the manual 'box have a breather? If not/or blocked could the oil be pushed past the (weak) seal by the air in the box heating up and expanding?

Just a thought...
1973 Dodge Challenger
MMA 616
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

Thanks mate.
It does and no I haven't checked it yet :thumbright:
No-one will believe you...
User avatar
db
Posts: 8368
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:50 pm
Location: Paul McQueen , N Wales

Post by db »

Breather is fine.
NO groove worn in the shaft where the seal lip sits.
NEW seal arrived from Bearing Man and doesn't fit :?
The old seal is 175 - 125 - 25
The new seal is 175 - 118 - 25 (closest they could find)
Now I expected the inner to be tight but the outer is the puzzle- they're both marked 175 but the new is 0.020" bigger :scratch:

Anyone in the U.K. supply top quality Imperial seals?
No-one will believe you...
Post Reply