Repeaters in the rear window???db wrote:I use orange bulbs in my reversing lamps. They're puny but legal. I'm very aware of it, especially on sunny days...
Turning right with a biker behing me is a bit nervy to say the least! I'd like to improve things but don't know how.
Red rear indicators and mot
Moderator: Moderators
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.
Mopar by the grace of God
Mopar by the grace of God
you can replace the outer most chrome bolts in your bumpers with chrome bolts that have LEDs in the middle
they come with a resistor and can be spliced into the indicator wires
you then show flashing amber
however they may not comply with the old height and distance from the edge of the car shennanigans
but then again
that might only apply to lights for lighting
VISIBOLTS®
http://kwikwire.com/lights-sockets/led- ... per-bolts/
http://www.classicautoproducts.com/visibolts.html
DAVE
they come with a resistor and can be spliced into the indicator wires
you then show flashing amber
however they may not comply with the old height and distance from the edge of the car shennanigans
but then again
that might only apply to lights for lighting
VISIBOLTS®
http://kwikwire.com/lights-sockets/led- ... per-bolts/
http://www.classicautoproducts.com/visibolts.html
DAVE
The Greater Knapweed near the Mugwort by the Buckthorn tree is dying
my issue is with other drivers not getting it... why not change the reverse lights to amber but simply tie them into the red blinkers? it will be like christmas but will make people think.cadboy wrote:XP29 wrote:I have seen a gen1 with the reverse lights as the indicators. It just seems daft to go from a huge light that's very noticable, to one under the bumper less noticable to get a pass because of a red/Amber thing.
It is not a problem as long as the drivers behind you know what it is when a RED indicator is flashing.
In UK most drivers are not used to seeing RED for indicator, only for brake.
So if someone hits you from behind when you were turning, then problem with insurance and the rest could follow, not worth the hassle mate, as the law says after 65 all AMBER indicator (does not matter the size).
LED's me no likey

Another solution (what i did). Leave the red lights as they are - and also add the amber bulbs in the reversing lights or the LED bolts, plus a switch so you can disable the red for a picky MOT man.
Having both red and amber flashers coming on together looks good, but strictly it is still an MOT fail as you should not have red indicators even if you have amber as well...
Having both red and amber flashers coming on together looks good, but strictly it is still an MOT fail as you should not have red indicators even if you have amber as well...
I understand it's an mot fail and therefore illegal to have red post 65. It just seems shortsighted for it to be so final and not look at each car. There are pre 65 cars driving with red. I have a large light that is easily seen, but illegal. To make it legal I have to disconnect that and can have a tiny light fitted which if on the chrome bumper in daylight might not be easily visable.
This would be my route, but I would use GREEN bulbs as the green behind a red lens shines amber.SJH wrote:Hello XP29,
I am currently doing this with my 67 Charger. I used the inner and outer bulbs for rear/brake lights and used the middle bulbs for indicators only using an amber LED bulb to shine amber through the red lens .
The brake light switch is wired through the indicator switch so I had to run a new wire from the brake light switch to the brake lights, and wire the rear lights from the number plate lamp as the rear lights use a resistance wire.
Shayne
Petty Roadrunner 416 Stroker 4 Speed
*MMA-609*
"Built to be driven!"
Why me???
*MMA-609*
"Built to be driven!"
Why me???

With the slope of the rear window I don't think any lights in the rear window would be noticable in daylight.Pete wrote:Repeaters in the rear window???db wrote:I use orange bulbs in my reversing lamps. They're puny but legal. I'm very aware of it, especially on sunny days...
Turning right with a biker behing me is a bit nervy to say the least! I'd like to improve things but don't know how.
If you have space inside the rear lens, you might be able to fit a line of green led's, as Carl said they'd show orange through the lens and if you could fit a line of them you could still have correct length for the car indicators while showing correct colour for MOT and law enforcement.
You can get strips of led's that can be bent to shape ( some people use them as angel eye effect when stuck to outer rim of headlights ), these might work as a solution
You can get strips of led's that can be bent to shape ( some people use them as angel eye effect when stuck to outer rim of headlights ), these might work as a solution
'68 Dodge Charger
‘75 Ford Ranchero
'93 Toyota Hilux Surf
YouTube - Double Zero Garage
‘75 Ford Ranchero
'93 Toyota Hilux Surf
YouTube - Double Zero Garage
My feeling exactly... They will use any possible reason to wriggle out of a claim. If someone rear ends you and says they didn't see you indicate... Who knows.Pete_B wrote:Personally id be more worried about an insurance company getting funny about things than i would be the MOT man.....
The problem is, I would risk running them red if the car where mine


I tried all sorts to keep the lights as it was when came out of the factor in 68.
Tried many different Amber LED inside the reverse lens, but lens is milky so didn't show on sunny days, only found out when indicated on M42 to pull out and no one would let me
So had no choice but to change the reverse to orange bulb and use as indicators.
Didn't fancy being hit from behind
Tried many different Amber LED inside the reverse lens, but lens is milky so didn't show on sunny days, only found out when indicated on M42 to pull out and no one would let me

So had no choice but to change the reverse to orange bulb and use as indicators.
Didn't fancy being hit from behind

Unfortunately it's not just the colour on post September 1st 1965 vehicles. I'm looking at the mot inspection manual right now and the reason for rejection states : adversely affected by the operation of another lamp e.g. dual function lamps on foreign vehicles.
Stupid rules set by stupid people I'm afraid.
Stupid rules set by stupid people I'm afraid.