Just testing...

News, jokes, computer help, whatever!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
RobTwin
Posts: 13847
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 05 5:05 pm
Location: just north of Watford

Just testing...

Post by RobTwin »

Just want to do a little comparo :-k

All uploaded here using photobucket...

Original photo, 3.04mb, using IMG code

Image

Original photo, 3.04mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3363.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3363.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Resized photo, 886kb, using IMG code

Image

Resized photo, 886kb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Original photo, 2.95mb, using IMG code

Image

Original photo, 2.95mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3412.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3412.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Resized photo, 1.22mb, using IMG code

Image

Resized photo, 1.22mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>


Well, I cant see any difference :roll:


They all look ok when you click on the pic and get it up :shock: in a new window, but in the post, when displayed a bit smaller they're a bit 'pixelated', or jagged :? which spoils them to my eye.

But some people dont get that problem :-k

Any advice Adam, Dave Mc? Anyone?
Image
Post Reply