Mopar Muscle Association UK

Just want to do a little comparo

All uploaded here using photobucket...

Original photo, 3.04mb, using IMG code



Original photo, 3.04mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3363.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3363.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Resized photo, 886kb, using IMG code



Resized photo, 886kb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Original photo, 2.95mb, using IMG code



Original photo, 2.95mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3412.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... CF3412.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Resized photo, 1.22mb, using IMG code



Resized photo, 1.22mb, using HTML code

<a href="http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/ ... esized.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>


Well, I cant see any difference


They all look ok when you click on the pic and get it up in a new window, but in the post, when displayed a bit smaller they're a bit 'pixelated', or jagged which spoils them to my eye.

But some people dont get that problem

Any advice Adam, Dave Mc? Anyone?