Faster times , Pod or Shakey?

Moderator: Moderators

Anonymous

Faster times , Pod or Shakey?

Post by Anonymous »

What's the reason better times are had @ the Pod? , bearing in mind it's uphill both tracks are pretty good , would it be due to the wind factor getting slower times @ Shakey? , it seems most pick up around 2/10ths @ the Pod over Shakey , me included. :?

:thumbright:
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

If you've got Google Earth installed, measure the length of both tracks. Looks like the Pod is a few feet short of 1/4 mile and SCR is spot on. Doesn't sound a lot but how long does it take to move the car 2 feet from a standstill?
I always feel like I'm getting better grip at the Pod, the track gets used more and sees a lot more of the faster cars that lay rubber.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Good point Mick. :thumbright:

I don't understand the 2ft from stand still? , if Shakey were a longer track then it would make a difference @ the end of track , how much ET difference 2ft would make @ over 100MPH i don't know.


:thumbright:
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 22108
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 10:49 pm
Location: MMA Chairman

Post by Pete »

Mr H. always states that a fastest time at Shakey does not count. ;)

The most accurate timing system is at the 'Pod.
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.

Mopar by the grace of God
User avatar
Adam
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:33 pm
Location: East Sussex

Post by Adam »

Perversely, I've always found Shakey to be a couple of tenths quicker than the Pod. I put it down to the fact that you usually have the prevailing SW wind behind you, whereas it's in your face at the Pod. Maybe Shakey favours slower cars (like mine) on street tires?
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

Pete wrote:The most accurate timing system is at the 'Pod.
The timing system at Shakey's is taken to a test house to be certified every year.
User avatar
Mick70RR
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 05 8:57 pm
Location: Birmingham

Post by Mick70RR »

I seem to get a better mph at Shakey's for some reason. I was told some time ago that both tracks climb up hill but the Pod climbs a little more than Shakey's.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Was gonne mention the one up Norf , but heard they move the timing counters around. :lol: :lol:





























Ok Ok only messin. :D
MilesnMiles
Posts: 7309
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 05 8:40 pm
Location: Cornwall

Post by MilesnMiles »

Time to get to Portreath, all downhill till the last bit, Brutus would be in the 9s ;)
User avatar
Cannonball
Posts: 17242
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:26 pm
Location: crewe, cheshire
Contact:

Post by Cannonball »

i ave always run faster at shakey, and most people i know
www.dwatts80.fsnet.co.uk

WATTS RACING TRANSMISSIONS, CLOBBER THE COMPETITION ITS CLOBBERIN TIME

OFTEN OUTNUMBERED NEVER OUTGUNNED,

HEY WHATS THE TOP END ON THAT SUPERSPORTS. UNLIMITED,

I HAVE A NVQW

LIFE GOES PRETTY FAST, IF YOU DONT LOOK ROUND A WHILE YOU MAY JUST MISS IT,

THE PASS IS THE JUICE,

LOVED BY FEW,
HATED BY MANY
RESPECTED BY ALL
NaughtyAlan

Post by NaughtyAlan »

Its a well known fact that 60fts are better at the pod but doesn't mean you will get a better overall et than shakey.
User avatar
Blue
Posts: 14417
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:29 pm
Location: Straight outta Royston

Post by Blue »

My best ever ET's have been at Shakey. My best MPH was at North weald, but we leaned very quickly that you just couldn't trust the clocks there, 12.5 @125 indeed.....
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
User avatar
DaveB
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:22 pm
Location: Thorne,Donny
Contact:

Post by DaveB »

9.80 shakey
9.93 pod
9.99 york

All fair game in my book,the air makes big difference on my car.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Better stick with Shakey then. 8-[
phil442

Post by phil442 »

Thought your PB was at Shakey (and Al's and Mick's). :dontknow:
Post Reply