Page 1 of 2
Brakes
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 2:10 pm
by autofetish
Am I barking up the wrong tree !!!!
My intended set up
1. Bulk head adapter from 4 stud to 2 stud
2. Performance master cylinder not sure if it 1.125 or 1.032 bore (same as in picture)
3. Standard Chrysler proportion / split valve
4. Line to rear bias valve in line
Rear brakes drums
Front brakes viper 4 pots
Never liked servo and possible low vac as blower motor
Thoughts on this set up please gents
Many thanks
Will
<a href="
http://photobucket.com/" target="_blank"><img src="
http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i205/ ... bbba7f.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo mancini-dual-inline-master-cylinders-without-mounting-hardware-1_zps8cbbba7f.jpg"></a>
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 2:35 pm
by Pete
Yep, that's right but the ball-breaker is knowing which bore M/C to buy.
Either loads or travel or very heavy pedal......
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 2:42 pm
by autofetish
It's the one I brought off you
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 2:51 pm
by Pete
Then it will be perfect!!
...or you can sell it back to me...
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 2:54 pm
by autofetish
Great will get it piped up and this steering uj on and get this Bananarama! engine in
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 3:04 pm
by Six-pack Speedshop
Have a stock m/c from a 90's voyager with stock disc / drum setup in my own Duster and works flawless. Don't know the bore out of my head but believe it's relative small for some pedal travel / feeling.
Looks like the same m/c in the pic though
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 3:54 pm
by autofetish
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 4:15 pm
by Pete
Biggest chamber is always for the Disc / Front brakes
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 5:21 pm
by Mossy68
So if I had one of those M/C's that would bolt straight to the booster I have
And connect to existing pipes etc ?
<img src="
" alt="Uploaded with Imgupr">
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 5:34 pm
by mopar_mark
If your switching from servo to non servo, don't forget to consider your brake pedal ratio.
Non servo brake pedals have a higher ratio, from memory around 8:1 Ratio
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 5:40 pm
by Pete
Mossy, that M/C almost looks like it was a Manual one that someone has "adapted" anyway.
I have never seen a M/C with 6 holes in it (mind you it is not the clearest picture in the world....
)
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 6:05 pm
by jerry
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 6:26 pm
by Mossy68
Pete wrote:Mossy, that M/C almost looks like it was a Manual one that someone has "adapted" anyway.
I have never seen a M/C with 6 holes in it (mind you it is not the clearest picture in the world....
)
Pete. The M/C is correct for the car and has been drilled to fit the unknown booster. The booster works fine but has a two bolt design rather than the four. Thought perhaps the M/C Will posted up would bolt straight on and save me a few quid ?
Sorry for hijack Will !
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 6:30 pm
by Pete
They ain't cheap, Mossy...your lead / granite one will be less costly.....
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 14 6:37 pm
by Mossy68
Pete wrote:They ain't cheap, Mossy...your lead / granite one will be less costly.....
Ahhh. That's that sorted then.
Cheers Pete
