Lightweight flywheel
Moderator: Moderators
- Nobbys-nails
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 13 10:41 am
- Location: Mansfield,Nottingham
Lightweight flywheel
Anybody running a lightweight flywheel? Pro's cons? Your thoughts gents please!!
I am in my mk1 escort, makes the car feel much more alive, revs quicker. No real down side from my point of view but the car is a manual; not sure what would happen with an auto car.
ARP bolts hold mine on in case it decides to exit at 8500 rpm
J
ARP bolts hold mine on in case it decides to exit at 8500 rpm

J
|| '68 Dodge Dart || '70 Plymouth Satellite || '72 Mk1 Escort || '98 AMG E55 || '85 2CV || S1 106 Rallye || E36 || E46 ||
Not in a V8 I havn't. Flywheels are heavy for a reason, they store inertia. That provides a smooth idle at low revs and a smooth pull away without dragging the engine down. A lighter flywheel will need a higher idle speed and a higher RPM when pulling away to avoid stalling. they are best suited to light high revving cars, I would imagine it would be a downright pain in the arse in a heavy road car. Back in the day when the 4 speed was king on the strip, the heavy cars actually used a heavier than stock flywheel for a faster launch.
“It’s good enough for Nancy”
- Nobbys-nails
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 13 10:41 am
- Location: Mansfield,Nottingham
No, I think you'd find it a miserable experience. I had one in my 1600 Anglia when I was a kid worked fine in that, light car revvy engine. That was also my first experience of a full race solid disc clutch on the steet, chattered like crazy and destroyed itself very quickly.
“It’s good enough for Nancy”