Another One for Dunc

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Wed Sep 03, 08 9:33 pm

Stu wrote:
The Beast was a custom made chassis with a fibreglass body, so was nowt to do with a Roller,

I never said it was, they are both as ugly as sin.

.....and you hush R.Runner

Stu · Post by **Stu** » Wed Sep 03, 08 9:36 pm

Wasn't sure which you were on about, Clivey, or both, so was covering both bases!

Rich · Post by **Rich** » Wed Sep 03, 08 9:50 pm

Clivey wrote:
How anyone can think that Roller is cool is beyond me. Being different is one thing, but buying a Rolls Royce and thinking you can improve it's looks by doing that to it is nothing short of being a Pikey.

Look at cars like Marks 71 Cuda and Steve Cases 70 Challenger,tube chassis,tubs,blown,etc and boh their cars are ace IMHO,so whats the difference when the base car is some thing a lot less desireable than the 2 mentioned.
Hack up a Roller i say,they are cheaper as a donor car than most muscle cars so even the builder is quids in..
Look at that mark 10 Jag in Connected at the Watford rods show.Twin turbo BBCif I recall,,,,Coooooooooooooooooooool as hell.

Charger · Post by **Charger** » Wed Sep 03, 08 11:30 pm

is that a carzy in the boot ... grab rails for holding on ... ??

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Thu Sep 04, 08 8:26 am

RichDeb wrote:
Look at cars like Marks 71 Cuda and Steve Cases 70 Challenger,tube chassis,tubs,blown,etc and boh their cars are ace IMHO,so whats the difference when the base car is some thing a lot less desireable than the 2 mentioned.

Whats the difference?????? A million light years Rich. That Roller isn't in the same ball park as Mark and Steve's cars - its not even in the same game. IMHO the quallity and work done on a project like that is just as important as choosing the right car in the beginning. The Roller owner got it oh so wrong. (there ust be some pile of cents growing - I have added another two).

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Thu Sep 04, 08 8:44 am

Yeah some models just wernt built for it!

It's like Mr R.Runner wearing sexy lingerie, it's just not right.

R.RUNNER · Post by **R.RUNNER** » Thu Sep 04, 08 12:01 pm

Woody wrote:Yeah some models just wernt built for it!

It's like Mr R.Runner wearing sexy lingerie, it's just not right.

I`ve told you before..........................don`t knock it til you`ve tried it????

Cannonball · Post by **Cannonball** » Thu Sep 04, 08 12:04 pm

Charger wrote:is that a carzy in the boot ... grab rails for holding on ... ??

reckon YOU would need it when that gentry nailed the throttle on that 1500 hp hemi

Cannonball · Post by **Cannonball** » Thu Sep 04, 08 12:07 pm

Clivey wrote:
RichDeb wrote:
Look at cars like Marks 71 Cuda and Steve Cases 70 Challenger,tube chassis,tubs,blown,etc and boh their cars are ace IMHO,so whats the difference when the base car is some thing a lot less desireable than the 2 mentioned.

Whats the difference?????? A million light years Rich. That Roller isn't in the same ball park as Mark and Steve's cars - its not even in the same game. IMHO the quallity and work done on a project like that is just as important as choosing the right car in the beginning. The Roller owner got it oh so wrong. (there ust be some pile of cents growing - I have added another two).

your so right clive that roller aint in the same ballpark handbuilt luxury saloon bein torn apart to put a bull Bananarama! hemi in it and wreck the wonderfull factory body and interior, when theres loads off Bananarama! mass produced rattlin n wobblin old mopars to cut up for that caper

RayC · Post by **RayC** » Thu Sep 04, 08 12:53 pm

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Thu Sep 04, 08 1:14 pm

Charger wrote:is that a carzy in the boot ... grab rails for holding on ... ??

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Thu Sep 04, 08 8:17 pm

mopar_mark wrote:Ok its A Roller, Not a Bentley, but what the hell

Got info from Moparts

Motor supposedly made 1,500hp without the N2O

Keep up old bean, been on here before my good fellow.

http://www.moparuk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21493

mopar_mark · Post by **mopar_mark** » Thu Sep 04, 08 11:54 pm

33 Plymouth wrote:Keep up old bean, been on here before my good fellow

Sorry about that old chap, will try & stay ahead of the field next time

Still, judging by the responses, quite a few had forgotten or missed it

Mopar Muscle Association UK

Another One for Dunc

Re: Another One for Dunc

Re: Another One for Dunc