Thanks Guys for all the replies.
Yes I too have seen some confusion over the correct orientation of the 'cupped' washer (it would help if they used the terms concave / convex more often).
So my interpretation is that the design changed somewhere around 65 to a 2 piece design as they are easier to fit. As long as the hole dia in the X member remained the same.
Morgan - Rob offered to pop over to you to collect those old bushes sometime. If you're ok with that I'd be very grateful.
And for $20 I might order those 'old stylee' ones as well.
Cheers, Stu.
Need a Bush
Moderator: Moderators
if the rubber is flat the washer curves away
of the bushing has a curved/ hemispherical face the washer cups the curved face.
2 types of rubber (flat both sides or hemispherical on one side)and so many manufacturers getting the washers mixed up
obviously there was a factory manual for each year
but bushings only available in latest style, which works with all years but only fitted to a few later models
hence only late model manual will have washer correct way for the late model bushings and all other manuals in respect to bushings could be incorrect dependent on the style fitted on day 1 of that model run.
the more the strut rod can move with the suspension up and down in the vertical plain the better.
the aim of the bushing is to stop the lower control arm waggling back and forth i.e altering the wheelbase of the car due to rolling resistance and bumps and buggering up the lower control arm bushing
hence when you see the bushings and cups out of the box common sense can be applied based on style and all will be well.
Dave
of the bushing has a curved/ hemispherical face the washer cups the curved face.
2 types of rubber (flat both sides or hemispherical on one side)and so many manufacturers getting the washers mixed up
obviously there was a factory manual for each year
but bushings only available in latest style, which works with all years but only fitted to a few later models
hence only late model manual will have washer correct way for the late model bushings and all other manuals in respect to bushings could be incorrect dependent on the style fitted on day 1 of that model run.
the more the strut rod can move with the suspension up and down in the vertical plain the better.
the aim of the bushing is to stop the lower control arm waggling back and forth i.e altering the wheelbase of the car due to rolling resistance and bumps and buggering up the lower control arm bushing
hence when you see the bushings and cups out of the box common sense can be applied based on style and all will be well.
Dave
The Greater Knapweed near the Mugwort by the Buckthorn tree is dying
Anytime... he knows where I am. Let me know when and if I'm out I'll leave them in the porch for him.Stu Twin wrote: Morgan - Rob offered to pop over to you to collect those old bushes sometime. If you're ok with that I'd be very grateful.
Cheers, Stu.
"Cum homine de cane debeo congredi." Woof.
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"

morgan wrote:Anytime... he knows where I am. Let me know when and if I'm out I'll leave them in the porsche for him.Stu Twin wrote: Morgan - Rob offered to pop over to you to collect those old bushes sometime. If you're ok with that I'd be very grateful.
Cheers, Stu.
You've got a Porsche too?

Sometime before the weekend would be handy - i'll pm ya


Regards driving it like that, Maybe best not to. My Chally bush nut came loose in France, stil drove OK, but braking caused huge judder as the LCA is basically moving back and forth un restrained.
Matt Hollingsworth - Vehicle Registrar
Panther Pink 73 Aussie Charger 265 Hemi 4 spd
Challenger Sam Posey Tribute car
Panther Pink 73 Aussie Charger 265 Hemi 4 spd
Challenger Sam Posey Tribute car